<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dramlicious.com &#187; Glen Scotia</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dramlicious.com/tag/glen-scotia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dramlicious.com</link>
	<description>whisk(e)y enthusiast and passionate blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 18:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia Victoriana</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-62/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-62/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 21:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=2024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reviewed the old disco-cows-on-happy-pills range from Glen Scotia on Tuesday. And today I am going to review the one! Some general thoughts about the new range: Although it is a good thing to have a more diverse (albeit smaller) range now, I am not feeling too happy about the fact that two out of three bottlings are now without an age statement. Add in the fact that all expressions are now colored and I am not that sure if this new range is a real improvement, at least on paper. With regards to the Glen Scotia Victoriana: I like the addition of a cask strength version. But I am not sold on the idea of finishing the whisky &#8216;in deep charred oak&#8217; (i.e. heavily burned out bourbon casks) after maturing it already in some sort of other bourbon casks. That sounds a bit like an overkill to me. Facts Glen Scotia Victoriana &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia Victoriana Age: NAS Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: Finished in deep charred oak casks Strength: 51.5% Vol. Colored: Yes Chill Filtered: No Nose Not bad, but needs time to open up. Vanilla, burned caramel and baked bananas with [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reviewed the old disco-cows-on-happy-pills range from <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> on Tuesday. And today I am going to review the one!</p>
<p>Some general thoughts about the new range: Although it is a good thing to have a more diverse (albeit smaller) range now, I am not feeling too happy about the fact that two out of three bottlings are now without an age statement. Add in the fact that all expressions are now colored and I am not that sure if this new range is a real improvement, at least on paper.</p>
<p>With regards to the <strong>Glen Scotia Victoriana</strong>: I like the addition of a cask strength version. But I am not sold on the idea of finishing the whisky &#8216;in deep charred oak&#8217; (i.e. heavily burned out bourbon casks) after maturing it already in some sort of other bourbon casks. That sounds a bit like an overkill to me.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_2027" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2027" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_1193-169x300.jpg" alt="Glen Scotia Victoriana" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia Victoriana</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia Victoriana</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/nas/" target="_blank">NAS</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td>Finished in deep charred oak casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>51.5% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Not bad, but needs time to open up. Vanilla, burned caramel and baked bananas with cinnamon. Polished wood and (not surprisingly) roasting flavors.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Very bitter. Tastes more like dark coffee than anything else. Charred oak as expected. Very dark chocolate with nuts. Gets spicier towards the end.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Very long. Dry, almost earthy. Very bitter again. Dark chocolate. More charred oak.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>I could be nice and say that this expression is &#8216;straightforward&#8217; but instead I am honest. To me, this expression is pretty bland and has not much to offer besides a heavy (charred) oak overload.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 75 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-62/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 15 Years Old</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-61/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-61/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 20:34:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=2018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reviewed the old disco-cows-on-happy-pills range from Glen Scotia on Tuesday. And today I am going to review the one! Some general thoughts about the new range: Although it is a good thing to have a more diverse (albeit smaller) range now, I am not feeling too happy about the fact that two out of three bottlings are now without an age statement. Add in the fact that all expressions are now colored and I am not that sure if this new range is a real improvement, at least on paper. With regards to the Glen Scotia 15 Years Old: The 16 Years Old was my least favorite bottling from the old range. Therefore I am all the more eager to tryout the new 15 Years Old. Although I can&#8217;t wrap my head around the fact that this expression (albeit one year older) is now colored&#8230; Are the used casks that much worse now? Facts Glen Scotia 15 Years Old &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia 15 Years Old Age: 15 Years Old Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: American Oak Barrels Strength: 46.0% Vol. Colored: Yes Chill Filtered: No Nose Cloudy apple juice, maybe even cider? Vanilla, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reviewed the old disco-cows-on-happy-pills range from <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> on Tuesday. And today I am going to review the one!</p>
<p>Some general thoughts about the new range: Although it is a good thing to have a more diverse (albeit smaller) range now, I am not feeling too happy about the fact that two out of three bottlings are now without an age statement. Add in the fact that all expressions are now colored and I am not that sure if this new range is a real improvement, at least on paper.</p>
<p>With regards to the <strong>Glen Scotia 15 Years Old</strong>: The 16 Years Old was my least favorite bottling from the old range. Therefore I am all the more eager to tryout the new 15 Years Old. Although I can&#8217;t wrap my head around the fact that this expression (albeit one year older) is now colored&#8230; Are the used casks that much worse now?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_2019" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2019" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_1191-169x300.jpg" alt="Glen Scotia 15 Years Old" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia 15 Years Old</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia 15 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td>15 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td>American Oak Barrels</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Cloudy apple juice, maybe even cider? Vanilla, pears and bananas. Fruit pie. Brown sugar and lemons &#8211; almost a bit like a caipirinha without the rum. Overall very multifaceted and engaging.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Strong and very spicy with a hard to identify fruitiness&#8230; maybe apples and pears with a hint of berries? Really hard to tell. Gets really bitter. Oak, espresso, walnuts and dark chocolate.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Medium. Dry and bitter. Espresso, dark chocolate and nuts.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>The good thing first. The nose is well done. Seriously, I really like it. But I am all the more disappointed with rest.<b class="b5"> </b>Taste and finish are just way, way too bitter for my liking. Definitively not my definition of &#8220;smooth&#8221; as stated on the label.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 76 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-61/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia Double Cask</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-60/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-60/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2015 19:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=2013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I reviewed the old disco-cows-on-happy-pills range from Glen Scotia on Tuesday. And today I am going to review the one! Some general thoughts about the new range: Although it is a good thing to have a more diverse (albeit smaller) range now, I am not feeling too happy about the fact that two out of three bottlings are now without an age statement. Add in the fact that all expressions are now colored and I am not that sure if this new range is a real improvement, at least on paper. With regards to the Glen Scotia Double Cask: Finally something different than the same old ex-bourbon cask maturation! Although I would have probably liked a &#8216;full&#8217; sherry cask maturation better. Facts Glen Scotia Double Cask &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia Double Cask Age: NAS Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: Oak Casks, Finished in 1st Fill Bourbon Casks and Pedro Ximénez Sherry Casks Strength: 46.0% Vol. Colored: Yes Chill Filtered: No Nose Full-flavored. Very fruity (fruit sugar!) and very sweet. A very strong note of sour cherries and fresh pressed cherry juice. Also in the mix: red apples and sultanas, flattered by hints of vanilla oak. All this is rounded [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I reviewed the old disco-cows-on-happy-pills range from <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> on Tuesday. And today I am going to review the one!</p>
<p>Some general thoughts about the new range: Although it is a good thing to have a more diverse (albeit smaller) range now, I am not feeling too happy about the fact that two out of three bottlings are now without an age statement. Add in the fact that all expressions are now colored and I am not that sure if this new range is a real improvement, at least on paper.</p>
<p>With regards to the <strong>Glen Scotia Double Cask</strong>: Finally something different than the same old ex-bourbon cask maturation! Although I would have probably liked a &#8216;full&#8217; sherry cask maturation better.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_2015" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="wp-image-2015 size-medium" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_11901-169x300.jpg" alt="DSC_1190" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia Double Cask</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia Double Cask</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/nas/" target="_blank">NAS</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td>Oak Casks, Finished in 1st Fill <a href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/bourbon/" target="_blank">Bourbon</a> Casks and <a href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/pedro-ximenez/" target="_blank">Pedro Ximénez</a> <a href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/sherry/" target="_blank">Sherry</a> Casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Full-flavored. Very fruity (fruit sugar!) and very sweet. A very strong note of sour cherries and fresh pressed cherry juice. Also in the mix: red apples and sultanas, flattered by hints of vanilla oak. All this is rounded off by the smell of burned dough.<b class="b3"> </b></p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>The entrance is strong and spicy, yet somewhat sweet. Vanilla sticks and caramel chocolate. The oak comes more forward now, followed by coffee beans.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Medium, spicy and rather strong. Coffee beans. Hints of vanilla.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>A nice entry level expression. The bourbon and sherry casks work well together.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 85 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-60/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 21 Years Old</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-59/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-59/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:52:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=1963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About three years ago, Glen Scotia launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;). So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one. Facts Glen Scotia 21 Years Old &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia 21 Years Old Age: 21 Years Old Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: Bourbon Casks Strength: 46.0% Vol. Colored: No Chill Filtered: No Nose Dust, yeast and grass. A lot of lemons. Some mandarins accompanied by floral honey and china spices. Peat and medicine. There is also a pretty strong touch of floral perfume. Taste Again lots of lemons. Oak and vanilla. Nuts. Gets spicier towards the end with pepper and ginger. Finish Long. Dry, bitter and slightly peppery. Milk chocolate. Overall Somewhat different than [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About three years ago, <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;).</p>
<p>So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1993" style="width: 180px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="wp-image-1993 size-medium" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/Glen-Scotia-21YO-170x300.jpg" alt="Glen Scotia 21YO" width="170" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia 21 Years Old</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia 21 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td>21 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Bourbon" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/bourbon/" target="_blank">Bourbon</a> Casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Dust, yeast and grass. A lot of lemons. Some mandarins accompanied by floral honey and china spices. Peat and medicine. There is also a pretty strong touch of floral perfume.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Again lots of lemons. Oak and vanilla. Nuts. Gets spicier towards the end with pepper and ginger.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Long. Dry, bitter and slightly peppery. Milk chocolate.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>Somewhat different than the 18 Years Old but not a real improvement.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 84 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-59/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 18 Years Old</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-58/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-58/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:40:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=1962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About three years ago, Glen Scotia launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;). So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one. Facts Glen Scotia 18 Years Old &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia 18 Years Old Age: 18 Years Old Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: Bourbon Casks Strength: 46.0% Vol. Colored: No Chill Filtered: No Nose Furnish polisher. Vanilla cookies, lemons and peaches. Followed by floral honey. A whiff of peaty ash in the back. Taste Thick and syrupy. Cinnamon, vanilla and chewy caramel. Followed by peach marmalade and nuts. A bit peppery and peaty around the edges. Finish Long. Spicy oak and apple pie with cinnamon. Overall While not groundbreaking by any stretch of imagination, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About three years ago, <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;).</p>
<p>So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1988" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1988" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_1114-169x300.jpg" alt="Glen Scotia 18 Years Pöd" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia 18 Years Old</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia 18 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td>18 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Bourbon" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/bourbon/" target="_blank">Bourbon</a> Casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Furnish polisher. Vanilla cookies, lemons and peaches. Followed by floral honey. A whiff of peaty ash in the back.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Thick and syrupy. Cinnamon, vanilla and chewy caramel. Followed by peach marmalade and nuts. A bit peppery and peaty around the edges.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Long. Spicy oak and apple pie with cinnamon.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>While not groundbreaking by any stretch of imagination, its at least nicely balanced compared to the younger ones.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 84 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-58/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 16 Years Old</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-57/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-57/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=1961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About three years ago, Glen Scotia launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;). So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one. Facts Glen Scotia 16 Years Old &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia 16 Years Old Age: 16 Years Old Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: Bourbon Casks Strength: 46.0% Vol. Colored: No Chill Filtered: No Nose Musty and dusty. Vanilla honey, oranges, lemons, cacao butter and cookie dough. A bit of peat. Seaweed, coastal and mineral. A bit all over the place but not exactly unpleasant. Taste Cinnamon and vanilla contrasted by salty licorice. Hints of lemon and peaty ash. Gets more bitter towards towards the end. Finish Medium with a peppery heat. Some salt. Again a [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About three years ago, <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;).</p>
<p>So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1982" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="wp-image-1982 size-medium" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_1111-169x300.jpg" alt="DSC_1111" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia 16 Years Old</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia 16 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td>16 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Bourbon" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/bourbon/" target="_blank">Bourbon</a> Casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Musty and dusty. Vanilla honey, oranges, lemons, cacao butter and cookie dough. A bit of peat. Seaweed, coastal and mineral. A bit all over the place but not exactly unpleasant.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Cinnamon and vanilla contrasted by salty licorice. Hints of lemon and peaty ash. Gets more bitter towards towards the end.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Medium with a peppery heat. Some salt. Again a bit bitter.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>For sure more complex than its two younger siblings but not necessarily in a good way.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 76 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-57/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 12 Years Old</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-56/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-56/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=1960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About three years ago, Glen Scotia launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;). So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one. Facts Glen Scotia 12 Years Old &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia 12 Years Old Age: 12 Years Old Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: Bourbon Casks Strength: 46.0% Vol. Colored: No Chill Filtered: No Nose Dry and slightly earthy. Also a bit peaty. Green apples, peaches and mandarins. Very fine hints of salt, but less than the 10 Years Old had. Taste Dry, creamy and oily. Also pretty waxy &#8211; a bit like licking a candle. A lot of peppery oak followed by floral honey. Then peaches, oranges and some nuts. A bit of peat [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About three years ago, <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;).</p>
<p>So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1978" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1978" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_1110-169x300.jpg" alt="Glen Scotia 12 Years Old" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia 12 Years Old</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia 12 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td>12 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Bourbon" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/bourbon/" target="_blank">Bourbon</a> Casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Dry and slightly earthy. Also a bit peaty. Green apples, peaches and mandarins. Very fine hints of salt, but less than the 10 Years Old had.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Dry, creamy and oily. Also pretty waxy &#8211; a bit like licking a candle. A lot of peppery oak followed by floral honey. Then peaches, oranges and some nuts. A bit of peat in the back.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Medium and spicy. Oak, bitter chocolate and nuts.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>Interesting to say the least! Just a bit too unbalanced overall.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 78 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-56/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glen Scotia 10 Years Old</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-55/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-55/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2015 19:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Campbeltown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Glen Scotia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=1934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About three years ago, Glen Scotia launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;). So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one. Facts Glen Scotia 10 Years Old &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Glen Scotia 10 Years Old Age: 10 Years Old Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Glen Scotia Cask Type: Bourbon Casks Strength: 46.0% Vol. Colored: No Chill Filtered: No Nose Pretty youthful in the nose &#8211; this single malt doesn&#8217;t hide its (young) age. Very sweet. Limes, oranges and unripe pineapples. Apple crumble with vanilla and caramel. Almost a bit peaty with a slightly maritime touch, which I like. Taste Buttery, dry and again very sweet. Vanilla, caramel, green apples, pears and kiwis. Also some nuts. Some hints of peat in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About three years ago, <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a> launched a complete new range, which I liked to call the disco-cows-on-happy-pills. Of course the content is more important than the packaging, but seriously, how can you come with that particular packaging for a whisky? Anyways, a couple of months ago Glen Scotia did yet another complete overhaul of their range: no more 10, 12, 16, 18 and 21 Years old but instead a new 15 Years Old and two NAS bottlings (&#8216;Double Cask&#8217; and &#8216;Vicotrina&#8217;).</p>
<p>So, time to compare! I will review the old range today and on Thursday the new one.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_1959" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1959" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/DSC_1109-169x300.jpg" alt="Glen Scotia 10 Years Old" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Glen Scotia 10 Years Old</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Glen Scotia 10 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td>10 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/glen-scotia/" target="_blank">Glen Scotia</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Bourbon" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/bourbon/" target="_blank">Bourbon</a> Casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Pretty youthful in the nose &#8211; this single malt doesn&#8217;t hide its (young) age. Very sweet. Limes, oranges and unripe pineapples. Apple crumble with vanilla and caramel. Almost a bit peaty with a slightly maritime touch, which I like.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Buttery, dry and again very sweet. Vanilla, caramel, green apples, pears and kiwis. Also some nuts. Some hints of peat in the back.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Medium. Drying and a bit salty.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>Very sweet and easy to sip, but a few more years of maturation wouldn&#8217;t have hurt. <span style="line-height: 1.5;">I like the combination of ex-bourbon and slightly maritime notes though.</span></p>
<p><strong>Score: 81 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-55/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
