<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>dramlicious.com &#187; Tullibardine</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dramlicious.com/tag/tullibardine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dramlicious.com</link>
	<description>whisk(e)y enthusiast and passionate blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2016 18:53:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Tullibardine 2007 (Cooper&#8217;s Choice)</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/dramcalendar-day-9/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/dramcalendar-day-9/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Dramcalendar 2015]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tullibardine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=2413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the ninth day of the Dramcalendar, we have the Tullibardine 2007, bottled by Cooper&#8217;s Choice. I will be honest and admit that my experience with Tullibardine is limited to the Tullibardine Sovereign. But that one was so bad, that it does not only has the top spot on my &#8220;worst whiskies of 2015&#8243; list, but also made me to avoid any other bottling coming from this distillery. But who knows, maybe today&#8217;s dram can change my mind? Facts Tullibardine 2007 (Cooper&#8217;s Choice) &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Tullibardine 2007 Bottler: Cooper&#8217;s Choice Vintage: 2007 Bottled: 2015 Age: 8 Years Old Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Tullibardine Cask Type: American Oak, Finish in Port Wine Pipe Cask Strength: 46.0% Vol. No. of bottles: 420 Colored: No Chill Filtered: No Nose Light and soft. Cooked red fruits for sure, but hard to tell which ones &#8211; maybe cherries? Speaking of cherries, someone just opened a big bag of cherry candies. Followed by cinnamon gum, menthol and caramel. Taste Very, very sweet and sticky, feels almost like sipping syrup. I don&#8217;t know, maybe orange syrup with vanilla beans? Then more sweetness, this time in form of rock sugar. A [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the ninth day of the <a href="http://dramlicious.com/episode-lists/dramcalendar-2015/" target="_blank">Dramcalendar</a>, we have the <strong>Tullibardine 2007</strong>, bottled by Cooper&#8217;s Choice.</p>
<p>I will be honest and admit that my experience with <a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/tullibardine/" target="_blank">Tullibardine</a> is limited to the <a href="http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-15/" target="_blank">Tullibardine Sovereign</a>. But that one was so bad, that it does not only has the top spot on my &#8220;worst whiskies of 2015&#8243; list, but also made me to avoid any other bottling coming from this distillery.</p>
<p>But who knows, maybe today&#8217;s dram can change my mind?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_2434" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><img class="size-medium wp-image-2434" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/Tullibardine-2007-Coopers-Choice-169x300.jpg" alt="Tullibardine 2007 (Cooper's Choice)" width="169" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Tullibardine 2007 (Cooper&#8217;s Choice)</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Tullibardine 2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Bottler:</strong></td>
<td>Cooper&#8217;s Choice</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Vintage:</strong></td>
<td>2007</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Bottled:</strong></td>
<td>2015</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td>8 Years Old</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/tullibardine/" target="_blank">Tullibardine</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td><a href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/quercus/" target="_blank">American Oak</a>, Finish in <a href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/port-wine/" target="_blank">Port Wine</a> Pipe Cask</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>46.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>No. of bottles:</strong></td>
<td>420</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>Light and soft. Cooked red fruits for sure, but hard to tell which ones &#8211; maybe cherries? Speaking of cherries, someone just opened a big bag of cherry candies. Followed by cinnamon gum, menthol and caramel.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Very, very sweet and sticky, feels almost like sipping syrup. I don&#8217;t know, maybe orange syrup with vanilla beans? Then more sweetness, this time in form of rock sugar. A bit too youthful around the edges.</p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Finish</span> </strong></p>
<p>Medium. Sweet and mild but ultimately pretty bland, so to speak.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>No doubt, the potential is there but this single malt is simply too young to unleash it. I think a few more years in the port pipe would have done wonders to the overall appeal of this expression.</p>
<p><strong>Score: 79 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/dramcalendar-day-9/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tullibardine Sovereign</title>
		<link>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-15/</link>
		<comments>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-15/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2015 06:30:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher Hayn]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tasty Tastings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Highlands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scotch Whisky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single Malt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tasting Notes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tullibardine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tullibardine sovereign review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dramlicious.com/?p=578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in 2013 Tullibardine launched a completely revamped range with a new entry level bottling, named Tullibardine Sovereign. Now to name a NAS entry level expression &#8216;Sovereign&#8217; is a pretty bold move, at least in my opinion. Just let me put it this way: When that one is already so excellent, than why on earth should I even consider to purchase one of the higher priced versions? Facts Tullibardine Sovereign &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; &#160; Name: Tullibardine Sovereign Age: NAS Category: Single Malt Scotch Whisky Distillery: Tullibardine Cask Type: First Fill Ex-Bourbon Casks Strength: 43.0% Vol. Colored: Yes Chill Filtered: No Nose For only 43% ABV mind-boggling alcoholic in the nose. After some time I can spot some light undertones of white fruits &#8211; apples, white grapes and plenty of pears. Joined by a subtle sweetness. However the alcohol remains present at all times. Taste Strong alcoholic. Then a very gentle sweetish fruity touch that gets buried under a wave of bitter oak immediately. Finish Long. Very spicy oak. Leaves a alcoholic aftertaste. Overall Very poorly integrated alcohol and overloaded with oak. This single malt is everything but &#8216;sovereign&#8217; &#8211; &#8216;immature&#8217; and &#8216;imbalanced&#8217; would be more appropriate terms. Score: 66 / 100 &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2013 <a title="Tullibardine" href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/tullibardine/" target="_blank">Tullibardine</a> launched a completely revamped range with a new entry level bottling, named <strong>Tullibardine Sovereign</strong>. Now to name a NAS entry level expression &#8216;Sovereign&#8217; is a pretty bold move, at least in my opinion. Just let me put it this way: When that one is already so excellent, than why on earth should I even consider to purchase one of the higher priced versions?</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Facts</strong></span></p>
<div id="attachment_579" style="width: 179px" class="wp-caption alignleft"><a href="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Tullibardine-Sovereign.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-579" src="http://dramlicious.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/Tullibardine-Sovereign-169x300.jpg" alt="Tullibardine Sovereign" width="169" height="300" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Tullibardine Sovereign</p></div>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td><strong>Name:</strong></td>
<td>Tullibardine Sovereign</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Age:</strong></td>
<td><a title="NAS" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/nas/" target="_blank">NAS</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Category:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Single Malt Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/single-malt-whisky/" target="_blank">Single Malt</a> <a title="Scotch Whisky" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/scotch-whisky/" target="_blank">Scotch Whisky</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Distillery:</strong></td>
<td><a title="Tullibardine" href="http://dramlicious.com/distilleries/tullibardine/" target="_blank">Tullibardine</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Cask Type:</strong></td>
<td><a title="First Fill Cask" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/first-fill-cask/" target="_blank">First Fill</a> Ex-<a title="Bourbon" href="http://dramlicious.com/glossary/bourbon/" target="_blank">Bourbon</a> Casks</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Strength:</strong></td>
<td>43.0% Vol.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Colored:</strong></td>
<td>Yes</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Chill Filtered:</strong></td>
<td>No</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Nose</strong></span></p>
<p>For only 43% ABV mind-boggling alcoholic in the nose. After some time I can spot some light undertones of white fruits &#8211; apples, white grapes and plenty of pears. Joined by a subtle sweetness. However the alcohol remains present at all times.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taste</strong></span></p>
<p>Strong alcoholic. Then a very gentle sweetish fruity touch that gets buried under a wave of bitter oak immediately.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Finish</strong></span></p>
<p>Long. Very spicy oak. Leaves a alcoholic aftertaste.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Overall</strong></span></p>
<p>Very poorly integrated alcohol and overloaded with oak. This single malt is everything but &#8216;sovereign&#8217; &#8211; &#8216;immature&#8217; and &#8216;imbalanced&#8217; would be<b class="b1"> </b>more appropriate terms.</p>
<p><strong>Score:</strong> <strong>66 / 100</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://dramlicious.com/tasty-tastings-episode-15/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
